26-Jan-2018 15:05 my foreign bride dating site  

Adult webcams broadcasting online
Chatroom 40old women

I am looking at some oracle views (v$system_event, v$session_event & v$session_wait) to make sense of the info gathered. It basically means that it can happen as the result of an idle wait (which is "innocent") or as the result of a non-idle wait (we were REALLY truly waiting for this to finish before doing something else) For example: [email protected] It is showing that we are idle However, its not ALWAYS an idle wait event.Top waits now are: db_file_sequential_read log_file_parallel_write io done. Say you are running a pro*c app you wrote, its a batch program. You look and see that the sql*net message from client is HUGE -- guess what that means.It leads me to believe the coder only knew how to do row at a time processing, and doesn't do any bulk SET oriented operations.That is like the difference between going to the library and asking for War and Peace a page at a time -- making the librarian run back and forth and back and forth versus Asking for War and Peace -- one bulk operation....It is a function of the size of the log buffer which you control. I understand the difference, however you said that the log posting waits can include both idle and non-idle conditions and can therefore be misleading.

sorry -- you'll want to relook at the logic, see if you can tighten it up, see if you can move things around.Even though they are written in parallel, one needs to wait for the last I/O to be on disk before the parallel write is complete. October 16, 2001 - pm UTC There can be IO slaves in the system and most all systems support async IO (fire the write off but don't wait for it so you can fire that next one off -- then wait for them all to finish).. In such cases, does Oracle write to log members alternatively in a round-robbin fashion. P2 blocks will be written to each log member, in P3 number of requests. If there were 2 requests, there would be two physical writes per log member. of log blocks will be divided up between the requests.I think the problem lies in the logic of the client. TO_DATE ) c WHERE a.prd_cd = b.prd_cd AND (( TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(a.prd_cd,7,2)) BETWEEN c.from_gsm AND c.to_gsm) OR (TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(a.prd_cd,7,2)) = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(a.prd_cd,7,2)))) AND (( TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(a.prd_cd,9,4))/10 BETWEEN c.from_width AND c.to_width ) OR ( TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(a.prd_cd,9,4))/10 = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(a.prd_cd,9,4))/10) ) AND ((TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(a.prd_cd,13,4))/10 BETWEEN c.from_length AND c.to_length) OR ( TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(a.prd_cd,13,4))/10 = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(a.prd_cd,13,4))/10)) AND (SUBSTR(a.prd_cd,2,3) = c.variety_cd OR 'ALL' = c.variety_cd OR SUBSTR(a.prd_cd,2,3) =SUBSTR(a.prd_cd,2,3)) AND (SUBSTR(a.prd_cd,5,1) = c.std_ret_ind OR 'B' = c.std_ret_ind OR SUBSTR(a.prd_cd,5,1) = SUBSTR(a.prd_cd,5,1)) AND (a.mchn_no = c.mchn_no OR c.mchn_no = 0 OR a.mchn_no = a.mchn_no ) GROUP BY SUBSTR (a.prd_cd,1,1) , SUBSTR (a.prd_cd,2,3) , SUBSTR (a.prd_cd,5,1) , TO_NUMBER (SUBSTR (a.prd_cd,6,3)) , TO_NUMBER (SUBSTR (a.prd_cd, 9, 4)) / 10 , TO_NUMBER (SUBSTR (a.prd_cd, 13, 4)) / 10 , a.mchn_no, B.Thanks for your immediate responce tom, well my query goes like this below. PEND_QTY, DECODE( SUBSTR(a.prd_cd,2,3) , c.variety_cd, c.dscnt_cd, DECODE(c.variety_cd, 'ALL', c.dscnt_cd, NULL)) , DECODE( SUBSTR(a.prd_cd,2,3) , c.variety_cd, c.oth_dscnt, DECODE(c.variety_cd, 'ALL', c.oth_dscnt, NULL)) , DECODE( SUBSTR(a.prd_cd,2,3) , c.variety_cd, c.remarks, DECODE(c.variety_cd, 'ALL', c.remarks, NULL)) HAVING (SUM(NVL(a.st,0)) - NVL(b.pend_qty,0)) 0 call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Parse 1 0.00 0.04 0 0 0 0 Execute 1 0.00 0.02 0 0 0 0 Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- total 2 0.00 0.06 0 0 0 0 Misses in library cache during parse: 0 Optimizer goal: CHOOSE Parsing user id: 324 ******************************************************************************** SELECT (NVL(OPNG_STOCK,0) NVL(RCPT_STOCK,0) - NVL(ISS_STOCK,0) - NVL(RET_STOCK,0) ) FROM T_GDW_DAILY_STOCK WHERE STOCK_DATE = :b1 AND PRD_CD = :b2 AND MCHN_NO = :b3 call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Parse 1 0.00 0.03 0 0 0 0 Execute 18480 36.69 88.65 0 0 0 0 Fetch 18480 8.77 20.28 0 73920 0 18480 ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- total 36961 45.46 108.96 0 73920 0 18480 Misses in library cache during parse: 0 Optimizer goal: CHOOSE Parsing user id: 324 (recursive depth: 1) Thanks in Advance Tom, May 08, 2003 - am UTC look at your logic try to figure out "well, hey, why do I run this query 18,480 times.

19-Jun-2017 14:58 Sex chat with old man  

Fucking chatting online free
songs about guys dating the wrong girl

On the negative side, some of them don't speak English.

26-Sep-2017 02:12 Live pritive chat sex with no sign in  

gay dating in lafayette louisiana
oxford graduates dating

On occasion, the speed and flow of the lyrics supersede the underlying beat: some people work out to rap songs, for example, with dense, swiftly spoken lyrics overlaid on a relatively mellow melody.

16-Jun-2017 12:23 Webcamsfreesex  

Chat with egyptian girls free
Dirty uae chat

And so the Rev’d David Ingall is presuming to separate sheep music from goat music, when King David said: ‘ (1Cor -31).

31-Oct-2017 13:43 Teen flirt xxx  

datingpro pilot group
Kostenloselive cam

Glasgow restaurants have become some of the most diverse in the country.

28-Sep-2017 00:25 adult sex dating in harrisburg oregon  

greek dating com
cons consolidating police agencies

I’ve little doubt the content is of the usual variety and quality: that is, seen it a hundred times elsewhere, can’t download, only stream.

02-Dec-2017 19:01 Meet local single women for free to fuck no credit card  

definition intimidating women
women rules for dating men

They find their maturity, independence and experience very appealing.